Just Jobs in Global Value Chains: Defining Inclusive Industrialization for ASEAN
5 January 2021
ABOUT THIS Report
Over the last three decades, the world has seen a shift away from arms-length trade brokered through trade agreements between governments toward a fragmentation of production processes across nations carried out through private transactions between firms.Â
Over the last three decades, the world has seen a shift away from arms-length trade brokered through trade agreements between governments toward a fragmentation of production processes across nations carried out through private transactions between firms.
These production chains span a range of activities that firms and workers undertake to bring a product from its conception to its end use, adding different degrees of value at each stage. Enabled by cheaper technology, transportation and lower tariffs, global value chains (GVCs) have helped many developing countries employ surplus labor in specialized manufacturing processes in sectors such as electronics, textiles, and garments.
This shift fuelled economic growth in the medium or low-income countries that were able to claim their share of global production chains. In recent years, the discourse on GVCs has evolved from describing the phenomenon of the fragmentation of production to understanding economic and social implications. However, there are few studies that examine the link between economic upgrading and social upgrading, which may go in both directions. Improvements in production processes can lead to a safer work environment and the upskilling of workers. Workers’ well-being and skills are a prerequisite for companies moving to higher tiers of GVCs where production employs more advanced technologies or diverse tasks. Previous studies in manufacturing and agricultural production show that the economic gains from greater integration into global production may not automatically translate into improvements in living standards.
Beyond a few such examples, studies often do not delve deep enough into the local context to understand what drives governments, businesses, and workers’ decisions to integrate into GVCs, and how economic upgrading relates to social upgrading in labor-intensive production chains. Understanding this is fundamental to assessing whether, and under what conditions, improvements in production processes lead to better living standards for workers.
To fill this gap, this study – conducted between 2017 and 2020 with support from the International Development Research Centre, Canada (IDRC), examines economic and social upgrading in the apparel sector in Vietnam and Myanmar, and the electronics sector in Vietnam and Thailand. The study is based on surveys of workers and firms, as well as semi-structured interviews with stakeholders including policymakers, industry representatives, and experts.
It seeks to assess the impact of GVC participation and economic upgrading in the apparel and electronics value chains on the quantity and quality of employment. It sheds light on what “inclusive industrialization” means in practice in countries such as Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar.
This signature volume of essays, part of a regular series curated and edited by the JustJobs Network, seeks to provide varying perspectives on the opportunities and challenges that technology, particularly digital platforms, pose for women’s work and delves into the impact of the platform economy on women's experiences in work.
This report tackles the crucial issue of how digital trends in India are unfolding and how they might impact the country’s world of work. It highlights the opportunities and challenges of these developments and the areas where policy intervention is needed to harness the potential of technology to improve labour market outcomes.
This report offers a nuanced understanding of how Apprenticeships can improve employability outcomes for India’s labour market at an uncertain time when forces ranging from technology to pandemics keep changing the rules of the game.
This report analyses India’s skills training ecosystem, delineating the challenges and the urgent need for deep reform. It provides recommendations for systemic change in the education-skill ecosystem that will help create a better, more inclusive, and equitable world for work for India’s youth.
This paper seeks to take stock of the main dimensions shaping the future of work in the South and South East Asia and present key messages and policy recommendations to create an innovative and inclusive future of work.
This book provides well-founded insights and guidance to (self-)manage work in a globalized and digitalized knowledge economy with a perspective of the year 2030. International researchers and practitioners draw a picture of how, when, and where we will work most probably in 10 years.
In her chapter on the potential of ASEAN's digital transformation, JJN President and Executive Director Sabina Dewan explores employment impacts of the region's major digital trends and how regional cooperation is critical to leverage economic advantages.
The pandemic is accelerating the advancement of technology, which was already restructuring labor markets. For many, technology has enhanced efficiency and enabled remote work, but for others, it has disrupted livelihoods. The key question is this: Whose jobs will vanish and who can access the new forms of work?
As the nature of work changes and more individuals derive an income from platform work, existing labour and social protection regulations are no longer fit for purpose. JJN and the Centre for Financial Regulation and Inclusion (Cenfri), with support from the German Development Corporation GIZ, conducted an initial scoping study that sheds light on employment, working conditions and labour and policy regimes for platform workers.